What does conflict focus on?

Study for the New York City DOC Conflict Resolution Test. Access flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

What does conflict focus on?

Explanation:
The main idea is that conflict focus should be on solving the problem by addressing people’s needs while keeping emotions under control. This means approaching the disagreement as a shared issue to resolve, using individuals’ coping abilities, and identifying what unmet needs are driving the conflict, all with low to moderate emotion so the discussion stays constructive. In practice, parties talk about the concrete issue, acknowledge what each person needs, consider coping strategies, and brainstorm options to meet those needs. That’s why this option is the best fit: it describes a problem-solving process where feelings are managed enough to think clearly, and the emphasis is on meeting needs rather than assigning blame or venting. The other descriptions do not fit the aim of conflict resolution: treating the situation as an emotional outburst that deserves punishment shifts focus to the person rather than the problem; blaming and accusing without coping strategies removes any path to resolution; and planning something logistical without considering feelings misses the essential element of addressing emotional and need-based aspects of the dispute.

The main idea is that conflict focus should be on solving the problem by addressing people’s needs while keeping emotions under control. This means approaching the disagreement as a shared issue to resolve, using individuals’ coping abilities, and identifying what unmet needs are driving the conflict, all with low to moderate emotion so the discussion stays constructive. In practice, parties talk about the concrete issue, acknowledge what each person needs, consider coping strategies, and brainstorm options to meet those needs.

That’s why this option is the best fit: it describes a problem-solving process where feelings are managed enough to think clearly, and the emphasis is on meeting needs rather than assigning blame or venting. The other descriptions do not fit the aim of conflict resolution: treating the situation as an emotional outburst that deserves punishment shifts focus to the person rather than the problem; blaming and accusing without coping strategies removes any path to resolution; and planning something logistical without considering feelings misses the essential element of addressing emotional and need-based aspects of the dispute.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy